Transformation of Mexican Politics

15). And a dictatorship it has been. The PRI, since its origination in 1929 (under a different name) has obeyed one rule: to disband conflicts of interest among the elite without bloodshed (Fuser, 1995, p. 15). As such, the PRI has earned the notation of having become the longest-lasting authoritarian regime of the 20th century(The Nation, 2000, p. 3). The PRI's genius, explains The Economist, has been to "cultivate faithfulness using repression only as a last resort. It flabby political dissent by permitting and even financing it"(2000, p. 25). Thus, for 71 years, in that location has been only one political institution of either signifi slewce in Mexico: the presidency.

Now, amidst the recent defeat of the PRI by the PAN, a new phase of Mexican politics is here, one that whitethorn be characterized by genuine party competition, fair and respectable elections, and ultimately, true democracy. In the July 2 elections, after a protracted struggle to forge institutions that could assure a relatively cleanse vote, Mexicans fin bothy had a chance to "kick the bums out"; Vicente switch received 16 million votes against the PRI's Francisco Labastida's 13 million. The fellowship of the parliamentary Revolution (PRD) candidate took 6 million votes. The significance of Fox's triumph (as healthy as the PRD's impressive stand) is immense; the PRI maintained it's tried-and-true garb of bribing and intimidating and ballot-box stuffing throug

Krauze, Enrique. "Do Dinosaurs Have Five Lives? The PRI has Always Evolved." Time International, August 16, 1999 v154 i6 p18.

It's a tall order, but one that appears to be in the fashioning in Mexico. With the creation of the most democratically-held election execute in recent memory, the establishment of a multi-party system in which all parties are legitimate, and a return to a truer sense of federalism, there is no telling how far Mexico may go. The political innovation in Mexico has ultimately been a success for the common people, who begin remained strong in the face of legendary opposition. The democratic process will serve them well.

However, in addition to the Labor Party and the Conservative Party, a third party also exists in Great Britain: the Liberal Democrats (formed in 1988)(Britain in the USA, 1999, www.britain-info.org). These three major(ip) parties do in some way reflect the party-system in Mexico- also a state with three major parties competing for power. A anomalous phenomenon thus occurs in Great Britain (and may well occur in Mexico): a fragmentation of the populace that can result in minority rule. British political theorist Stuart Weir sums up the effect of the multi-party system when he writes, "we are unique among Western nations in giving a single party control of both government and the popular assembly establish on a minority of the vote at commonplace elections"(1994, p. B22).

The lion's share of Mexico's success can be attributed to Vicente Fox and the Mexican people. Fox, using political savvy and positive campaigning, managed to instill in poor Mexican peasants the courage to defy intimidation and slump bribes in favor of voting for democracy and social progress(Morris, 2000, p. 7). The sizeableness of the new "Mexican Revolution" cannot be understated; self-directed Senator Adolfo Aguilar Zinser explains that in Mexico, the victory of the PAN over the PRI is "comparable to the hit of the Berlin Wall, the end of apartheid, and the v
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.