Welfare Policy

Jobs plans atomic number 18 part of cordial form _or_ system of government. So also atomic number 18 the Miranda decision and Affirmative work and the Department of Education's regulations about bilingual education (Murray, 1984, 13).

Murray also gives a clear indication of the goal of these programs, noting that each has a worthful objective that is being addressed by a shipping of resources from the haves to the have-nots. This transfer of funds increased greatly during the period from 1950 to 1980, just now even increased expenditures did not deliver the goals intended.

Ellwood (1988) finds essentially that the goals and the methods undertaken are the same as Murray indicates, but he considers the issue more(prenominal) in terms of the effect on the American family specifically. He also keep an eye ons that everyone hates the offbeat system as it has developed. Defenders of the system pronounce it is misunderstood and that critics are simply being selfish, but Ellwood feels that many another(prenominal) critics have valid complaints. He in fact cites Murray as one who would like to help the poor but who feels that reforms are needed. Ellwood finds the complaints to have a much more vestigial butt:

Welfare is a flawed method of helping slew who are poor and disadvantaged. Welfare brings some of our most valued values--involving autonomy, responsibility, work, family, community, and compassion--into conflict. We want to help those who are not making it but, in so doing, we seem to

They ordain not make single parents much more profitable or eliminate their child care responsibilities. They volition not raise wages. They will not reinforce and strengthen families. They will not give the poor real dignity or responsibility. They will not do much to integrate the fundamental conflicts of the welfare system (Ellwood, 1988, 10).

Murray, C.T. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy 1950-1980. impudently York: Basic Books.

Ellwood asks the essential question--should welfare be ameliorate or replaced? He notes that the country has gone through some(prenominal) attempts at welfare reform, or at least discussions of welfare reform with an eye to making changes if a good program can be developed.

The conservatives have called for the elimination of welfare, and Ellwood rightly notes that no one expects this call to be heeded. What is being discussed is the imposition of modernistic obligations and responsibilities on recipients, with the government in turn providing training or jobs. Ellwood considers these issues and notes that while they would help, they would not have more than a downcast effect on the caseload and on the ability of the disadvantaged to render for themselves. Ellwood points out the reason for this--none of these changes would address the real issue, which is that such modifications do nothing about the real problem of poverty:

exasperate the efforts of those whoa re struggling hard just to bet by (Ellwood, 1988, 6).

Albert, V.N. (1988). Welfare dependence and welfare policy. New york: Greenwood Press.

Bullock, Anderson, and Brady (1983) discuss AFDC programs and note how extremely liberal policies toward such payments in New York contributed to the near-bankruptcy of New York City. AFDC is a particularly costly program, prompting many states to research help from the federal government in reducing costs. iodine approach has been to encourage states to locate fathers who have deserted their children and to state support payments from
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.