Gender Identity

Gender identity has been the subject of various research and experiments , particularly since the contention of its development has been institutionalized often as a debate akin to the nature versus nurture paradigm that pits biological and genetic background and yield against that of society s influence , peculiarly family socializingThough a soulfulness may have physical characteristics suggesting their end to be male or pistillate , behavior , resource and in some cases , socialization or medical disturbance play a hand in developing a person s self-perception and sexual urge identity , especially in cases br wherein the individual was born with congenital defects pertaining to their sex organsExamples of such defects argon cloacal exstrophy and congenital adrenal hyperplasia . The former is a rare complaint fix in infant boys wherein their penises were either extremely wasted or xistent while the latter is a disease found in girls wherein they produce excessive amounts of male hormone throughout their lives despite the presence of female sex organs (Dingfelder , 2004 . These dickens defects are treated by either reassigning a modernistic sex for the individual during infancy through medical re building of their sex organs and appropriate socialization by the individuals families , deny the knowledge of their previous medical condition . Usually , when reassigning gender , and even sex of a person through medical intervention and surgery , female genitals are constructed because construction of such is easier than male genitals (Dingfelder , 2004 . This practice of `reassigning gender shows how in practice , both biological and social influences are use in find out a person s gender socialization . Normally , a person would identify himself or herself to a gender that fit the physical characteristics of the body and this would be reinforce by the socialization of his or her early years at home from the primary caregivers .

The interplay of biological and social factors in determining a person s gender identity is taken into circumstance here However , this wishes to seek more knowledge on which aspect provides more influence , as well as the nature of this influenceNormal practice , as mentioned above , is posited as a process of differentiation (Net Industries , 2008 ) wherein social and biological influences shape a person s identity over time along with his or her cognitive-learning ability (Net Industries , 2008 . This would also posit that for males and females , the process of differentiation occurs similarly but each with a different set of factors that would influence a person to be one or the separate (Net Industries , 2008 . For a female , a certain set of factors mustiness be present for this differentiation to occur , such as the presence of female genitals at infancy , which is to be followed by socialization found on the presence of the mentioned female genitals . A male would undergo male-suited socialization based on being born with a penis . olibanum it may be posited that the distinction of the genitals provide a basic cue for society on a person s gender identity . The question then arises as to the mishap of opposite socialization techniques in differentiating gender...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .