In reading an clause recently on the privatized bail in Alaska called, ?PRIVATE PROTECTION: SECURITY OFFICERS IN ALASKA.?, I was in truth taken back by how closely it related to the hearty I was currently being taught in an Organizational gage and Management course, through the University of Phoenix, online. Most of the information contained in this article coincided, closely verbatim, with the information contained in our course reading material, with a few minor adjustments in figs and statistics. The article was compose for the Alaska Business Monthly Journal, By GUDDE, LEVI, who has more than 40 years experience in the public law enforcement and cliquish security fields.
According to the article, the current public law of nature officer to insular security personnel ratio in Alaska is more or less 2-1, which is pretty lower than the national average. Our text suggested that by the year 2000, the number of police officers had increased to over 600,000 and security personnel numbered rough 2 million, when this is calculated; it puts the national ratio of public police officer to private security at almost 3.5-1, in favor of the security personnel. The article separates that there ar approximately 2000 security officers compared to 1000 public law enforcement officers, in the state of Alaska today.
That figure runs parallel to the rest of the United States with regard to private security officers currently employed. The expenditures (salary) for security services are almost three times that of public law enforcement as this is reflect by the fact that security officers outnumber police officers by more than a 3 to 1 margin. It is also quite clear that security services are the primary tutelary service in the United States (Fagin, 2007; Siegel & Senna, 2007). In go on reading, the article goes on to explain that public police officers are unable...
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment