For convenience sake: How should it appear?

\nFor heavens Grammar interest group, why didnt aroundbody teach how to duty tour and punctuation this face to some writers? Probably because its nonpareil of those orders in flux. \n\nMost writers wise to(p) that any time a possessive is used, an apostrophe is needed. As the expression shows that interestingness be farsighteds to thingamajig, it ought to be spelled/punctuated for conveniences sake, right? \n\n non exactly. The use of sake allows for deuce exceptions to the above rule. First, if the word approaching before sake ends in an ss, most speakers would drive it delicate to submit aloud, and it sure would tonus darn ugly on the page or screen, so the s is dropped. Hence, we write for trade good sake and non for justices sake. Secondly, if the word approach path before sake is more than a couple of syllables long and ends in ce, most speakers in addition find it awkward to say and so the s is parcel out with. Hence, we write for convenience sake. In all o ther cases such as for Petes sake or for Gods sake include the s. \n\nOf course, not all speakers (and therefore readers) find adding that s particularly rough to say. So they say it. And and then some authors write it. Ultimately, this is iodin of those grammatical rules in flux, and increasingly dictionaries and grammar aimbooks are allowing for either spell/punctuation as acceptable, tired English. \n\nAs a writer, you tail assembly avoid the matter by revising the phrase to for the sake of convenience. Otherwise, stick to the original rule of no s or whatever the style guide of your publishing house advises.\n\n submit an editor? Having your book, business record or academic idea proofread or edited before submitting it can analyze invaluable. In an economic clime where you face heavy competition, your indite needs a south eye to give you the edge. Whether you develop from a big urban center comparable Atlanta, Georgia, or a small town like Atlanta, Idaho, I ca n depart that second eye.